home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
051793
/
05179934.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
11KB
|
216 lines
<text id=93TT1730>
<title>
May 17, 1993: How Long Will The Bull Run?
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
May 17, 1993 Anguish over Bosnia
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
WALL STREET, Page 44
How Long Will The Bull Run?
</hdr>
<body>
<p>Despite high stock prices, most market pros aren't too worried,
yet
</p>
<p>By JOHN GREENWALD--With reporting by John F. Dickerson and Jane
Van Tassel/New York and William McWhirter/Chicago
</p>
<p> The warning signs are everywhere. Share prices in the
relentlessly upbeat stock market now stand at sky-high levels
by historical standards, and dividend yields have fallen to near
record lows--classic signals that the bull market that began
2 1/2 years ago has got dangerously long in the tooth. At the
same time, companies continue to flood Wall Street with new
issues to cash in on the bull's run before it can stumble--another omen that the market may be overheated and headed for
a fall. Even the current rush of little-guy buyers is usually
a harbinger of a bear market.
</p>
<p> Much of the money propping up share prices comes from
small savers who have put their money into mutual funds simply
because returns on alternative investments have got so low. With
money-market deposits and CDs barely eking out 2% in interest,
individuals poured a record $11.3 billion into stock mutual
funds in March, snapping up shares so fast that managers barely
had time to invest all the cash. Buyers feasted on all kinds of
funds, from those that purchase slow-growth utility stocks to
aggressive acquirers of speculative new firms. But the binge
failed to satisfy the public's ravenous appetite for shares. "If
I had more money, I think I'd put it all in the market," says
Winston Mason, 72, a Los Angeles retiree. "Oh yes, I think right
now is the time."
</p>
<p> This stampede into the risky world of stocks has only
heightened concern that the market may soon come tumbling down.
Never far from bearish minds is the 1987 crash, which saw the
Dow Jones industrial average plunge 508 points on Black Monday.
Even more frightening was the more recent, and more devastating,
collapse of the Japanese stock market that began in 1990, when
the bloated Nikkei average plummeted from nearly 39,000 to less
than 15,000 in 2 1/2 years. Then there are recollections of the
Great Crash itself, which have become part of America's memory.
"People start thinking of the '20s and '30s," says author and
retired fund manager Peter Lynch, "and almost everyone seems to
have had an Uncle Louie who lost everything and ended up
selling pencils."
</p>
<p> So is this the time to get out of stocks? In spite of the
danger signs, few Wall Street gurus foresee a sharp downturn
anytime soon, as long as interest rates stay low. That's because
investors still have plenty of liquid funds left: they hold
nearly $3 trillion in low-yielding investments like bank CDs and
are likely to continue moving them into stocks. Even if share
prices start to tumble, experts say, fund managers and cash-rich
individuals will swiftly scoop up bargains and thereby halt the
slide before it can erode the market 20%--the level that
indicates a bear market has begun. Last Friday the market closed
at 3437.19, up 9.64 points for the week and down 41.42 points
from its April 16 peak.
</p>
<p> Still, many investors--and especially small investors--are starting to get nervous. "The mood is sour but not
panicky," says John Markese, research director of the American
Association of Individual Investors. "People are less certain
about the economy, less optimistic about the political
environment than they were at the start of the year, and not
quite certain that the recovery is taking hold."
</p>
<p> One source of concern is the Clinton Administration, which
many on Wall Street now regard with disdain. Investors fret
that Clinton's proposed tax hikes and forthcoming plans to
finance health-care reform would slow the economy, squeeze
corporate profits and thereby bring stock prices down. At the
same time, critics charge that Clinton's often wishy-washy style
has helped chill business and consumer confidence. "A weak
presidency always makes markets very nervous," says Stephen
Bell, the Washington-based managing director of Salomon
Brothers. "We saw that late in the Bush Administration, and
we're seeing it now under Clinton. People are having doubts that
Clinton is up to the task."
</p>
<p> The national economy is throwing off its own confusing
messages. A continuing sluggish recovery is certainly bad news:
it threatens to trim corporate profits and cause stock prices
to slump. But a robust recovery might have the same effect: by
boosting interest rates it could entice investors back to banks
and money markets and put the bull to flight. The key to
everything seems to be interest rates. "If you get a major rise
in rates, it will kill the market," says Marty Zweig, who runs
the Zweig Funds.
</p>
<p> A big jump in interest rates would also clobber the bond
market, to which mutual-fund buyers have flocked as well. Bonds
took off on a powerful rally last November that has pushed
long-term yields to their lowest level in 20 years (the higher
a bond's price, the lower its interest yield). A spurt in
interest rates would have the opposite effect, halting the boom
and sending bond prices spiraling down.
</p>
<p> Even without higher interest rates, Wall Street bears
argue, the market is perilously overvalued. On average, stocks
now fetch prices that are 23 times as high as corporate profits
as measured by earnings per share; the stock of a company with
profits of $3 per share would therefore sell for a whopping $69.
This heady price-earnings multiple is nearly twice the average
for past markets and stands even higher than the one just before
the 1987 Wall Street crash.
</p>
<p> The bears further point out that stocks are returning
little to investors in the way of dividends. On average,
dividend payouts currently equal just 2.8% of stock prices, the
lowest yield since August 1987. "The market has rarely been this
high in terms of price to earnings or dividends," says James
Grant, an investment-magazine editor who predicts a break in
prices. "The eternal paradox is that people will buy more cars
or canned goods when the price is down, but they seem to buy
more stocks when the price is up."
</p>
<p> Many investors are increasingly hunting for bargains
abroad, where stock prices and yields are often more attractive.
"We are moving to markets in Europe, where levels are clearly
a lot cheaper than in the U.S.," says Barton Biggs, managing
director of equity research for Morgan Stanley. "And to Asia,
where the real economic growth in the world is taking place."
Chicago's Wanger Asset Group has already collected $160 million
in its overseas funds only seven months after opening for
business. Much of the money is headed for Japan, where the stock
market is slowly recovering from its speculative meltdown.
Americans invested more than $3 billion in Japanese stocks in
this year's first quarter alone.
</p>
<p> Wall Street's numerous bulls, however, counter that
traditional measures of stock value have become misleading in
today's fitful economy. They say price-earnings ratios are out
of whack because many companies wrote off restructuring costs
and took other special charges that depressed profits last year.
"Anyone who says the market is overvalued is not looking at the
whole picture," asserts Bill LeFevre, a veteran Wall Street
watcher who puts out an investment newsletter. "Why did we have
such crummy earnings? A lot of it was the huge write-offs."
</p>
<p> In the same way, bulls say the current low dividend yields
remain in line with the returns on bonds and other
interest-bearing investments. A 2.8% dividend payout doesn't
look so bad, they note, when compared with the low level of
interest rates in general. "This cycle is unlike anything since
the Second World War, because we haven't got to the point where
rates have gone up, and a rise doesn't seem to be on the radar
scope," says Charles Blood, director of financial-markets
analysis at Brown Brothers Harriman. Concurs LeFevre: "With
lower interest rates it is understandable that stocks command
a lower dividend yield because stocks have growth whereas bonds
don't."
</p>
<p> Most market watchers doubt that a sharp spike in interest
rates is on the horizon. With inflation still hovering near a
mild 3%, the Federal Reserve Board would seem to have little
reason to tighten the money supply and push interest rates up.
Moreover, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan has been calling for years
for the White House and Congress to take the tough action needed
to bring down the deficit. Now that such efforts are under way, a
Federal Reserve source notes, "Alan doesn't want to discredit
the enterprise" of deficit reduction by jacking up rates and
further weakening the recovery.
</p>
<p> Market optimists also fiercely dispute the conventional
wisdom that small investors rush into the stock market just
before it crashes and then sell out in a panic. On the contrary,
many experts say, the little guy is increasingly in for the
long haul, with an eye toward putting his children through
college or investing for retirement. In the 1987 crash, for
example, it was institutional investors, rather than
individuals, who fled wholesale from the market.
</p>
<p> Still, there is no way to avoid risk when buying and
selling stocks. Unwary investors who switch from risk-free CDs
or Treasury bills to the stock market can find themselves in a
frightening new world where prices can rapidly decline.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, high roller Irwin Jacobs says that
because of low interest rates, "people are being forced to make
investments where they never would have been otherwise. That is
going to be scary for a lot of people who are very naive and
inexperienced out there." Says Blood of Brown Brothers Harriman:
"You just know that some people are making inappropriate
investments. There are people who are buying funds who don't
realize that one day they can wake up and lose three years of
accumulated income."
</p>
<p> Experts say the remedy for such roller-coaster rides is to
invest for the long term rather than trade frequently in an
effort to time market swings. "Stock market declines are
normal," says Peter Lynch, who notes that the Fidelity Magellan
Fund he managed fell nine times during his 13-year tenure.
"Stocks have still averaged an 11% return through depressions
and world wars," Lynch adds. "But if you're unable to stand
volatility, you should not be in. If you spend more than 14
minutes a year worrying about the market, you've wasted 12
minutes."
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>